- Years of ADA Shakedowns Alleged, And A Law Firm SettlesPosted 2 days ago
- $10M Settlement In Riot Games Gender Discrimination LawsuitPosted 2 days ago
- Senate Report Highlights Illicit Transfer of Tech to ChinaPosted 3 days ago
- Supreme Court Reverses Federal Circuit, Grants Cert in Oracle v. GooglePosted 3 days ago
- Law Firm Sued For Defamation, After Aggressive Move In Bankruptcy CasePosted 4 days ago
- Pre-Holiday Breach At Macy’sPosted 4 days ago
Eschew the Federalist Society, Says Former Federal Judge

November 25, 2019
James P. Donohue, a former federal judge, recalls that the parties before him were often at the low point of their lives, but one of them was destined to feel lower still, because he was about to render a decision that could result in bankruptcy or prison. “I know that the integrity of the judiciary was a powerful reason for the losing party to accept a bad outcome. Preservation of judicial integrity is why the Code of Conduct exists,” he writes. He references Advisory Opinion 116, prohibiting judges from engaging with organizations involved with “hot-button” political issues or that the public associates with political positions. Additionally, it says judges must stay away from groups funded by “persons or companies engaged in political activities.” According to Donohue, the opinion’s effect is to bar judicial participation in organizations such as the Federalist Society, which he characterizes as the epitome of a now-prohibited organization—one committed to create a system of “limited, constitutional government [that the country has not seen] since before the New Deal.” He writes that Chief Justice John Roberts’ distress because of public perception that the Supreme Court is a political rather than a judicial institution is well-founded. A recent poll indicated that, by a 55 to 38 percent margin, the public believes Supreme Court decisions are guided by a justice’s political views rather than by the law. “Perhaps the chief could help change this perception by persuading his colleagues to avoid political events, such as the Federalist Society black-tie gala,” at which Justice Kavanaugh was the keynote speaker. The Federalist Society can espouse its conservative ideology without participation by judges, Donohue says. “But it is not clear that the judiciary’s reputation for integrity can survive if judges continue to participate in Federalist Society functions.”
Read the full article at:Slate
Related Posts
-
Years of ADA Shakedowns Alleged, And A Law Firm Settles
A Silicon Valley law firm has settled a lawsuit...
-
$10M Settlement In Riot Games Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
Riot Games, a $1B-plus company owned by Chinese technology...
-
Senate Report Highlights Illicit Transfer of Tech to China
A recent report published by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee...
-
Supreme Court Reverses Federal Circuit, Grants Cert in Oracle v. Google
The Supreme Court will hear Google’s petition for cert...
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Cancel reply
Litigation News
-
Years of ADA Shakedowns Alleged, And A Law Firm Settles
A Silicon Valley law firm has settled a lawsuit alleging that it was shaking down small businesses by filing...
- Posted 2 days ago
- 0
-
$10M Settlement In Riot Games Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
Riot Games, a $1B-plus company owned by Chinese technology firm Tencent, has agreed to a $10 million payout to...
- Posted 2 days ago
- 0
-
Law Firm Sued For Defamation, After Aggressive Move In Bankruptcy Case
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals has reinstated a defamation case against a law firm, in a ruling denying the...
- Posted 4 days ago
- 0
-
Pre-Holiday Breach At Macy’s
It hit the retailer over a one-week period early in October, scooping up essential information from credit transactions. The...
- Posted 4 days ago
- 0
Labor/Employment News
-
$10M Settlement In Riot Games Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
Riot Games, a $1B-plus company owned by Chinese technology firm Tencent, has agreed to a $10 million payout to...
- Posted 2 days ago
- 0
-
Insurance May Cover Allegations Related To Sexual Abuse
Claims against companies related to sexual abuse – such as negligent hiring or negligent supervision and negligent retention –...
- Posted 2 weeks ago
- 0
-
Legal Battle With Ex-CEO At Barnes & Noble Is A Study In Privilege
The CEO of Barnes & Noble was accused of sexual harassment by an executive assistant, triggering an investigation under...
- Posted 2 weeks ago
- 0
IP News
-
Grunts Flummoxed By 21st Century IP Issue
The “right-to-repair” – or more accurately the absence of one – has been an issue in a variety of...
- Posted 2 weeks ago
- 0
-
Cybersecurity Protocols and ADR
Surveys taken after the massive Panama Papers hack suggested that law firm cybersecurity industry-wide was lagging behind health care...
- Posted 2 weeks ago
- 0
-
Photographer Sues Law Firm For Using His Skyline Photo
A Kansas City photographer has sued a law firm, claiming it used his copyrighted work on its website without...
- Posted 2 weeks ago
- 0
John Marshall
November 25, 2019 at 11:28 am
Of course, they can be part of the American Bar Association, an overwhelmingly liberal/Democrat lobby. BTW, Donahue is a retired magistrate judge. He was not a “federal judge.”
JM
November 25, 2019 at 12:15 pm
Who will determine whether an organization is “involved with ‘hot-button’ political issues or that the public associates with political positions?” NRA? ACLU? NAACP? Planned Parenthood? ABA? Local school board? Homeowner Association?
What about past participation in an organization that is “involved with ‘hot-button’ political issues or that the public associates with political positions?” Surely, just because someone is no longer a paying member and is not attending (or receiving awards at) a “black tie” dinner does not mean they are viewed by the public as impartial/non-political (e.g., Justice Ginsberg.