- Frenzied Speculation Over Kennedy RetirementPosted 14 hours ago
- Death Of Trump Corruption Enforcement Greatly ExaggeratedPosted 2 days ago
- Supreme Court Deals Blow To Workers’ RightsPosted 2 days ago
- Your Location Data, Bought And SoldPosted 3 days ago
- Meet The World’s Most Consequential RegulatorPosted 3 days ago
- Uber Does An About Face On Non-DisclosurePosted 6 days ago
New IP Protection for Fashion Industry
Kimberly A. Warshawsky, Ballard Spahr LLP
Fashion brands in the United States have no specialized laws to protect their designs and innovations. They must rely upon existing intellectual property laws to protect what they create. They have increasingly relied upon design patents and trade dress to protect and enforce their rights, but often the industry has moved on to something new by the time the design patent issues, and trade dress requires proof of secondary meaning.
In its March 2017 decision, in Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, the Supreme Court held that design features can be afforded copyright protection, provided the design (1) could be seen as a work of art separate from the “useful article” upon which it was placed and (2) would otherwise qualify for protection under the Copyright Act.
The Court expressly abandoned the distinction between “physical” and “conceptual” separateness between the design and the useful article. Instead, the Court ruled that a design element is “separate” from an article’s utilitarian aspects for purposes of Section 101 if the design or feature can exist as its own pictorial, graphic or sculptural work that is not itself useful once separated.
Star Athletica provides fashion brands with the option to protect designs and artistic elements in an affordable and straightforward manner. The Supreme Court has provided much needed clarity and consistency for those seeking registrations and enforcement, which means that designers and fashion brands can better plan their IP and protection strategies.Read the full article at:
Today's General Counsel