- MN Climate Lawsuit First To Target KochPosted 4 days ago
- Tips For GC Trying To Survive The Litigation PandemicPosted 4 days ago
- Ragged Implementation But Overall Success For GDPRPosted 5 days ago
- Data From 200 Police Departments HackedPosted 6 days ago
- Trump Appoints 200th JudgePosted 6 days ago
- A Giant Canary In The Digital Coal MinePosted 1 week ago
Protecting Investments in IP and People
Executive Summary of an article written by
Roxann E. Henry and Eric Akira Tate, Morrison & Foerster
Even if you have no products that compete with another company, that company can be your competitor for employees. And competition triggers antitrust laws. The Antitrust Division took numerous executives and Human Resource (HR) staff by surprise with its intense campaign against no-poach (i.e., employee non-solicitation) agreements. Agreements not to compete can subject a company to criminal fines of up to $100 million or double the loss or gain from the agreement. Individuals involved in such agreements face a statutory maximum of 10 years in prison.
The vast majority of states still enforce non-competition agreements that are reasonable in scope. Restrictive covenants with individual employees that are less restrictive than non-competition agreements still appear to be universally enforceable. Employers are still free to require employees to sign confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements. Even the Antitrust Division has recognized that there are situations where employee non-solicitation provisions are permissible.
Don’t assume that courts will enforce restrictive covenants simply because an employer and employee agree to them, or that you can avoid antitrust problems by explaining what you are doing to the affected employees. Beware entering into non-solicitation and similar agreements (particularly about setting wage rates) with other companies. It may violate antitrust law. Companies may be vigorously competing for employees, but agreements to set benefit levels could still be criminal. Look at your compliance program; include HR personnel in the antitrust training; and consider whether written materials need updating.Read the full article at:
Today's General Counsel